The second of two posts sharing examples of how our Long Term Support subscription is helping create EHS-driven cultures at customer sites

This is the second of two posts sharing examples of how our Long Term Support subscription is helping create EHS-driven cultures at customer sites.

In the first post, I shared how supervisors at two customer sites are now leading some risk assessments themselves. The same kind of ownership shift is happening with incident investigations.

We’re seeing this at three customer sites across different manufacturing environments.

In 2025, Baron led the incident investigation process. Now, supervisors are accountable for starting the investigation.

Baron is still helping with root cause analysis and corrective actions, but that is part of the transition. We are coaching supervisors through the process so they can take more ownership, from starting the investigation to driving it to closure.

Supervisors leading risk assessments. Supervisors starting incident investigations. Baron coaching them through the next steps.

Here’s the question I’d ask any site leader:

At your site, do supervisors own the incident investigation process, or are they mostly waiting for EHS to lead it? If the answer is mostly EHS, then start moving practical EHS responsibilities closer to the operation.

And if your site keeps replacing EHS people but the same ownership gaps remain, maybe it’s time to consider a team-based EHS model.

That’s the thinking behind our Long Term Support subscription.

Throw some questions at me. I’ll answer any and all.

Happy to chat whenever you’re ready.

Cheers! Brian