Is EHS run through one person...or built into the operations team? The EHS Long Term Support subscription solves this.

"What We Do" versus "What We Don't". Is Baron the Right Fit? Let's talk about it.

Wouldn’t it be nice if your EHS program ran as smoothly -- AND AS CONFIDENTLY -- as Tesla’s Full Self-Driving? No overcorrecting. No last second scrambling. Just steady progress with the system handling the complexity behind the scenes. While the car handled the road, I recorded this quick story: - One client had a single bad formula in their RPPR spreadsheet. - We caught it. We aligned the NOx and nitric acid usage as the permit required. - We likely cut a week-long DEP audi

Oxymoronic, or just plain moronic? They say, "less is more”. But when it comes to EHS demands, less clarity leads to...more headaches. I’ve heard it all: • "We need a sustainable short-term fix." • "Let’s delegate accountability to one person." • "Our compliance is fine… except for the fines." EHS is already demanding—don’t make it more complicated with contradictions. There’s a better way to get it done right. Have you researched any team-based, all-inclusive EHS outsourcing

Is your EHS program adding real value or just adding to overhead? Fair warning: my comments here may be a bit too blunt for some. So if you’d rather avoid the reality of what’s often left unspoken in departments like EHS, you may want to keep scrolling. But if you’re a Plant Manager ready to tackle some hard truths, read on. With this week’s news about a Department of Government Efficiency, it’s worth asking—how efficient are the roles we rely on to keep things running? EHS i

Baron Environmental participated in the 2/25/20 AHMP (Alliance of Hazardous Materials Professionals) Chapter Meeting at Duke Farms in...